Why Merrill went with Thain instead of Fink

Posted Nov 14th 2007 3:10PM by Peter Cohan
Filed under: Management, Citigroup Inc. (C), Merrill Lynch (MER)

CNBC's Charlie Gasparino reported that Laurence Fink, who was offered the Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) CEO job, asked Merrill's board for a complete accounting of the subprime problem there before he would agree to accept the position. This request encouraged Merrill's board to "go in a different direction."

If Fink did not like the results of the subprime audit, he could have turned down the position and left Merrill's board in the awkward situation of needing to disclose the truth of the situation. What I find amazing is that Merrill's board needed Fink to drag it into making such an audit. And then it decided that it would rather offer the CEO job to someone else who wouldn't force it to come to grips with its problems.

John Thain is going to have a tough job ahead of him. But Merrill's gain is Citigroup Inc.'s (NYSE: C) loss.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup stock and has no financial interest in Merrill Lynch.

Tags: c, citigroup, inthenews, John Thain, JohnThain, Laurence Fink, LaurenceFink, mer, merrill lynch, MerrillLynch